Grackle & Sun

The Fast and the Fugitive

It’s time to play…

OR

It’s all fun and games until your colours fade away.   When we talk about dyes, we often refer to them in one of two ways:  substantive or adjective.  A substantive dye is one that does not need a mordant to adhere to the fiber.  It is capable of bonding directly to the fiber on its own.  An adjective dye does not bond to the fiber on its own and requires a mordant to help the dye adhere in a lasting manner.  We also use a few other terms when talking about dyes—like fast and fugitive.  A dye that is fast means that it has staying power.  A dye that is fugitive means that it’s going to run for the hills–ie, is going to fade in some manner and make you weep tears of woe for all your hard work wasted.  This fading can happen by washing, wearing, or being exposed to light—the latter being one of the more common ways for a dye to fade.   From what I’ve read, there are very few substantive natural dyes.   The majority require you to add a mordant to your dyeing process to help not only bond the dye to the wool, but also to help a fugitive dye become more wash- or lightfast.  It is recommended that one perform a lightfastness test on naturally dyed yarn to determine whether or not you’ve achieved a relatively stable dye.  This is also recommended to test for fastness anytime you experiment with a new process or dyestuff.  It lets you see firsthand if it worked.

Following are the results from the lightfastness test I conducted on the dyes used for Dye Day #1.  It is very important to note:  This is the unmordanted yarn that I used as a control.  I repeat, this yarn is unmordanted!   I wanted to see how fast these dyes were on their own.  To my knowledge, with a mordant such as alum, these dyes are all quite lightfast.  The lightfastness test was conducted for exactly 1 month, from June 23 to July 23.  Swatches of each yarn were collected, and half was tucked between several sheets of dark construction paper, while the other half was left exposed to full sunlight outside.  Here goes:

As you can see, the majority of the swatches demonstrate a study in lightfastness FAIL.  A few, like the elm and onion, only faded a little bit.  The alkanet faded more than I expected, but given how super unexpectedly dark it dyed to begin with, it’s really faded to closer to the colour I thought it was going to dye anyway.  Particularly low scores go to safflower and eucalyptus.  They surprised me.  And the TOTAL FAIL! of the lightfastness test goes to… annatto seed.  Whoa, nelly!  For something that was so willing to dye everything in sight, it sure did fade fast.  The annatto was gone by week 2.  Some of these dyes, like the eucalyptus, are said to be substantive, and I think that perhaps under normal circumstances it would not have faded so much.  We’ve had crazy high UV days here this summer, such that it would test the lightfastness of dirt, I think.   I suspect that if this test were conducted at a different time of year, the onion, alkanet, elm, and eucalyptus would have faired much better.  Just conjecture, but I think a safe assessment.   As always, I’d love to hear about your results with natural dyeing.

Live happy, dye happy!

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

8 thoughts on “The Fast and the Fugitive

  1. Your results are so interesting – it’s like you said in your last post, “Why does the sun sometimes set the dye and sometimes fade the color?” I will benefit from your information next time I try some natural dyeing.

  2. Thank you. Am having fun and learning along the way.

  3. Very interesting, thank you for sharing your results! Light-fastness testing is an area I know I should be doing, but so far I’ve never quite got round to it…

    It is amazing how fast some of those colours faded – did you by any chance test the mordanted yarns too?

    • Thank you. Actually, the mordanted yarns I dyed on Dye Day technically belonged to a friend who at the last minute was unable to attend. So I dyed her yarn for her, took pictures, and then gave it back. I’m not sure if anyone else who did the workshop has done a lightfastness test or not. In the future, I’ll be doing one for all the dyes, and will post results.

  4. We’ve had about 4 days of summer here, so I haven’t done any tests like I’d planned. Those samples look like what I got with vegetable dyeing. I’m quite surprised at the eucalyptus… I remember from last year weld being super good, for the others I’ll have to search for my samples. I’m so organized, yeah…

    • The UV scale goes from 1-11, and we’ve had many days of 8 and higher this summer. That’s really high, and I think probably has a lot to do with the fading of the dyes normally considered substantive.

      • Well, it’s not often that you leave your sweaters or blankets in a window for 30 days straight either.

      • Or in this case, outside in the full sun. I better not find any of my handknits laying around outside! Someone would be in big trouble.

Add to the conversation :)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: